35/100
Topical relevance
The link is judged against the target page first. A powerful domain is still weak if the source page, site theme and target intent do not overlap.
Free tool
A 5-signal audit to know whether a backlink prospect is relevant, safe and worth the price.
Preloaded example. Open each signal and edit the fields: the score recalculates live.
What kind of backlink is this?
The 5 signals behind the score
The method is deliberately manual: it forces the buyer to compare the backlink prospect with the exact page that should receive the link, instead of trusting one isolated metric.
This is not a domain-wide backlink scanner like Ahrefs, Semrush or Moz, which list every backlink pointing to a site. It scores one specific backlink prospect you are about to buy, against the exact page it should point to.
35/100
The link is judged against the target page first. A powerful domain is still weak if the source page, site theme and target intent do not overlap.
25/100
DR is useful, but DR alone is not enough. Dofollow referring domains and organic traffic are used together, with a fallback when data is missing.
15/100
An in-content editorial link is more useful than a footer, sidebar, comment or forum profile link. Outbound links on the page dilute attention.
15/100
The score penalizes exact commercial anchors, weak content and a language or market mismatch. A non-dofollow link and unconfirmed indexation are no longer score penalties: they are blocking No-Go conditions that stop the audit before a score is even computed.
10/100
Price is a smaller weight because a cheap irrelevant backlink remains a bad backlink. It matters once the other four signals are measured.
The score is a manual decision aid, not a ranking promise. It does not replace a manual SERP, cache, indexation and footprint check before buying.